The origin of life - abiogenesis - has nothing to do with the change
in the gene pool over time, observed in populations of living species.
Evolution has nothing to do with, and does not attempt in any way to
address the question of the origin of life. You're conflating two
different subjects together.
What you've done is as silly as
someone trying to deny that it is possible to ride a bicycle and arguing
that the biggest hole to the theory that it is possible to ride a
bicycle is scientists inability to explain scientifically, the forces
that keep a moving bicycle upright.
It's also like someone denying that a John Doe is human because they can't determine his origin - who his parents are. How foolish!
Presenting the lack of a
definitive explanation for the origin of life as being a hole in the
theory of evolution, only reveals a massive gaping hole in the OP's
knowledge and/or intellectual honesty.
And bringing in the subject of the evolution of the universe is tantamount to the fallacy of equivocation. The word evolution as used of the universe is completely different to biological evolution. Biological evolution has to do with reproduction and genetics. The evolution of the universe has nothing to do with reproduction and passing on traits. The only thing they have in common is the common spelling of the world evolution. So just because the origin of the universe might be relevant to the subject of the universe's evolution does not mean that the origin of life has to be relevant to the subject of the evolution of life.